1) Publication Decisions and Duties of the Editor-in-Chief, Issue Editors, Scientific Committee, and Editorial Board

The Editor-in-Chief has ultimate responsibility for all decisions concerning the publication of manuscripts submitted to the journal. In making such decisions, the Editor acts in accordance with the aims and editorial policy of Arkete, ensuring that each decision is guided solely by scholarly merit, originality, and philosophical relevance.

In the editorial process, the Editor-in-Chief is assisted by the issue editors and by at least two independent reviewers selected from scholars and experts outside the Scientific Committee and the Editorial Board, according to a double-blind peer review procedure.

The Editor-in-Chief, the issue editors, the Scientific Committee, and the Editorial Board must maintain strict confidentiality throughout the editorial process. No information about submitted manuscripts may be disclosed to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, or individuals directly involved in the editorial evaluation. Unpublished materials contained in submitted manuscripts must not be used by the Editor, issue editors, or committee members for their own research without the author’s explicit written consent.

The Editor and issue editors are committed to ensuring a fair and transparent selection process, free from any discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, political opinion, institutional affiliation, or philosophical orientation. If the Editor identifies or is informed of errors, conflicts of interest, or plagiarism in a published article, they shall promptly inform the author and the publisher, investigate the matter, and, if necessary, issue a correction or a retraction.

---

2) Duties of Reviewers

Reviewers play an essential role in maintaining the scientific and philosophical quality of the journal. They assist the Editor and issue editors in their decisions by providing reasoned and constructive evaluations, and, when appropriate, by suggesting modifications or clarifications that may improve the manuscript.

A reviewer who feels unqualified to assess a manuscript, or who knows that they cannot meet the deadline for the review, must immediately notify the Editor or the issue editors and withdraw from the review process. All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and must not be shown or discussed with others except when authorized by the Editor.

The review process must be conducted with rigor, respect, and impartiality. Criticism should be expressed in clear, reasoned terms and must not include personal remarks about the author. Any reference to existing arguments, theses, or published works should be cited precisely to support the reviewer’s observations. Reviewers are also expected to alert the Editor to any substantial similarities between the manuscript under review and other works known to them, or to any suspicion of plagiarism.

Information or ideas obtained during the peer review process must not be used for personal advantage. Reviewers must decline to evaluate manuscripts when conflicts of interest arise from relationships of collaboration, competition, or close personal connection with the author.

---

3) Duties of Authors

Authors submitting a manuscript to Arkete are responsible for ensuring the full originality of their work and for the accuracy of its conceptual and bibliographic content. When drawing on the ideas, formulations, or results of other authors, they must provide accurate citations, clearly distinguishing paraphrases from literal quotations.

Authors of research articles must present their data and arguments honestly and discuss their significance and limitations in an objective manner. Each submission must include accurate references to all sources that have substantially influenced the work. By submitting a manuscript, authors confirm that it has not been previously published and is not under consideration by any other journal. If accepted, the author grants Arkete the right of first publication, while retaining moral rights and allowing open-access dissemination under the journal’s publication license.

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, writing, or revision of the work. All co-authors must approve the final version of the manuscript and agree to its submission for publication. Any sources of financial support or institutional affiliation relevant to the work must be clearly acknowledged in the manuscript.

Authors have a duty to promptly inform the Editor of any significant errors or inaccuracies discovered after publication and to cooperate in the correction or retraction of the article.

---

4) Conflicts of Interest

A conflict of interest may arise when an author, reviewer, or member of the editorial board has personal, professional, or financial relationships that could inappropriately influence — or appear to influence — their judgment.

The Editor-in-Chief takes all necessary measures to ensure transparency in the editorial process, managing potential conflicts of interest primarily through the double-blind review system and, when appropriate, by requesting formal declarations from the authors or reviewers concerned.